Legal Research & Brief Drafting for IP Attorneys with USPTO Patent Center

USPTO Patent Center IP Attorney Patent Prosecution

The Problem

Associates lose entire days in ipManager hunting for Patent Prosecution case law that supports a narrow argument — and the final brief is still 70% boilerplate.

What We Build in USPTO Patent Center

AI drafts the research memo against the firm's prior work product, pulls current authority from ipManager, and produces a cite-checked first draft of the brief — associate refines, doesn't start from zero. Purpose-built for teams running USPTO Patent Center — uses the native API or agent integration so nothing leaves the system of record.

USPTO Patent Center Integration Approach

1

Audit your USPTO Patent Center configuration

We map the specific USPTO Patent Center objects, custom fields, and workflows the automation needs to touch for your patent prosecution practice.

2

Build on the USPTO Patent Center API or agent

Integration happens inside USPTO Patent Center — no data leaves the system, no parallel tool for your team to learn, no license changes.

3

Human-in-the-loop handoff

Every automation routes exceptions back to a human in USPTO Patent Center with enough context to act — AI handles the 80%, your team owns the judgment calls.

See this running in your USPTO Patent Center instance

30-minute call. We'll look at your actual USPTO Patent Center setup and show exactly how this workflow fits.

More About This Workflow

Legal Research & Brief Drafting for IP Attorneys

AI drafts the research memo against the firm's prior work product, pulls current authority from ipManager, and produces a cite-checked first draft of the brief — associate refines, doesn't start from zero.

Other USPTO Patent Center Automations