Patent Prior Art Search for Litigation Attorneys with Clio
The Problem
Prior art searches for Commercial Litigation matters take days in Relativity, and the attorney still has to read every hit to judge relevance.
What We Build in Clio
AI runs the search across USPTO, EPO, and Relativity, ranks hits by claim-overlap relevance, summarizes each, and builds the search report — attorney starts from a triaged list, not a raw dump. Purpose-built for teams running Clio — uses the native API or agent integration so nothing leaves the system of record.
Clio Integration Approach
Audit your Clio configuration
We map the specific Clio objects, custom fields, and workflows the automation needs to touch for your commercial litigation practice.
Build on the Clio API or agent
Integration happens inside Clio — no data leaves the system, no parallel tool for your team to learn, no license changes.
Human-in-the-loop handoff
Every automation routes exceptions back to a human in Clio with enough context to act — AI handles the 80%, your team owns the judgment calls.
See this running in your Clio instance
30-minute call. We'll look at your actual Clio setup and show exactly how this workflow fits.