Patent Prior Art Search for Litigation Attorneys with Everlaw

Everlaw Litigation Attorney Commercial Litigation

The Problem

Prior art searches for Commercial Litigation matters take days in Relativity, and the attorney still has to read every hit to judge relevance.

What We Build in Everlaw

AI runs the search across USPTO, EPO, and Relativity, ranks hits by claim-overlap relevance, summarizes each, and builds the search report — attorney starts from a triaged list, not a raw dump. Purpose-built for teams running Everlaw — uses the native API or agent integration so nothing leaves the system of record.

Everlaw Integration Approach

1

Audit your Everlaw configuration

We map the specific Everlaw objects, custom fields, and workflows the automation needs to touch for your commercial litigation practice.

2

Build on the Everlaw API or agent

Integration happens inside Everlaw — no data leaves the system, no parallel tool for your team to learn, no license changes.

3

Human-in-the-loop handoff

Every automation routes exceptions back to a human in Everlaw with enough context to act — AI handles the 80%, your team owns the judgment calls.

See this running in your Everlaw instance

30-minute call. We'll look at your actual Everlaw setup and show exactly how this workflow fits.

More About This Workflow

Patent Prior Art Search for Litigation Attorneys

AI runs the search across USPTO, EPO, and Relativity, ranks hits by claim-overlap relevance, summarizes each, and builds the search report — attorney starts from a triaged list, not a raw dump.

Other Everlaw Automations